Changes: Forum:Relationship Categories

Latest revision as of 08:02, 4 November 2010

Forums: Index > The Wizengamot archive > Relationship Categories

I have noticed some categories have been created like Category:Seamus Finnigan's romantic relationships and Category:Lavender Brown's romantic relationships. I think that categories like these are unnecessary. I mean, they only have a few articles, and If you really want to know who these people's relationships are/were, then you can read their articles. It would make sense if they had like 10 relationships, but its only 1 or 2. What does everyone else think? -- Ratneer^{Owl Me!} 22:22, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

I don't think it's unnecessary. Cho's and Ginny's relationship categories have 4 and 3 respectively. -- GrouchMan (Send an owl then scram!!) 22:26, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

I now disagree with my self. These categories are neccesary. I hadnt looked into it. -- Ratneer^{Owl Me!} 23:00, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
-I have noticed some categories have been created like [[:Category:Seamus Finnigan's romantic relationships]] and [[:Category:Lavender Brown's romantic relationships]]. I think that categories like these are unnecessary. I mean, they only have a few articles, and If you really want to know who these people's relationships are/were, then you can read their articles. It would make sense if they had like 10 relationships, but its only 1 or 2. What does everyone else think? {{User:Ratneer/sig include}} 22:22, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
+I have noticed some categories have been created like '''Category:Seamus Finnigan's romantic relationships''' and [[:Category:Lavender Brown's romantic relationships]]. I think that categories like these are unnecessary. I mean, they only have a few articles, and If you really want to know who these people's relationships are/were, then you can read their articles. It would make sense if they had like 10 relationships, but its only 1 or 2. What does everyone else think? {{User:Ratneer/sig include}} 22:22, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
 :I don't think it's unnecessary. Cho's and Ginny's relationship categories have 4 and 3 respectively. -- [[User:GrouchMan|<font color="Green">GrouchMan</font>]] ([[User talk:GrouchMan|<font color="Green" size="1">Send an owl then scram!!</font>]]) 22:26, December 14, 2009 (UTC)