Harry Potter Wiki
Harry Potter Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
 
*[[Minerva McGonagall's wand]]: http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7238&catid=21
 
*[[Minerva McGonagall's wand]]: http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7238&catid=21
   
*[[Remus Lupin's wand]]: http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7238&catid=21
+
*[[Remus Lupin's wand]]: http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7199&catid=21
   
 
*the [[Weasley twin's wands]]: http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7495&catid=21
 
*the [[Weasley twin's wands]]: http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7495&catid=21
Line 35: Line 35:
   
 
:I'm in favour of having articles for some of these wands, but I don't know if we should have articles for all of them. If we have no information about the wand, only an image, then is there any point? For instance, in an article about Snape's wand, we could mention that Voldemort believed Snape to be the master of the Elder Wand since he killed Dumbledore. But what is there to say about Cho's wand, for instance? [[User:Oread|<font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000A0>O</font><font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000FF>r</font><font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000A0>e</font><font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000FF>a</font><font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000A0>d</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Oread|<font face="Times" color=#800080>(talk)</font>]]</sup> 01:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 
:I'm in favour of having articles for some of these wands, but I don't know if we should have articles for all of them. If we have no information about the wand, only an image, then is there any point? For instance, in an article about Snape's wand, we could mention that Voldemort believed Snape to be the master of the Elder Wand since he killed Dumbledore. But what is there to say about Cho's wand, for instance? [[User:Oread|<font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000A0>O</font><font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000FF>r</font><font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000A0>e</font><font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000FF>a</font><font face="Monotype Corsiva" size="4" color=#0000A0>d</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Oread|<font face="Times" color=#800080>(talk)</font>]]</sup> 01:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  +
  +
:couple more links;
  +
[[Bellatrix's wand]]: http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7976&catid=21
  +
[[Mad Eye's wand]]: http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7270&catid=21
  +
Darth Jadious 10:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:38, 15 April 2009

Forums: Index > The Wizengamot > Non-canonical wands


There are several wands in the films that aren´t described in the books. They are for sale. Couldn´t we write article´s for them in the wands category, add the non-nanon tag and upload pictures?--Rodolphus 17:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Just because they are from the films does not mean they are non-canon - unless it specifically contradicts the books, then it is eligible. - Cavalier OneGryffindorcrest(Wizarding Wireless Network) 18:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

´

Okay. I´ll write a list of the wands now , with links to pictures, but I don´t think that my English is good enough to write the articles.

All links lead to the noble collection.

There are some wands that are shown in films but not for sale, for example the Patil twins wands, shown on this picture.

Patil twins OOTP

--Rodolphus 18:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I think I can start writing the articles... And, as Cavalier One noted, they aren't non-canonical, according to Harry Potter Wiki's Canon Policy. -- Seth Cooper Owl Post 18:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I don´t want to press anyone to write, but, could anyone please begin to write? As said above, my English is not good enough.--Rodolphus 09:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


I'm in favour of having articles for some of these wands, but I don't know if we should have articles for all of them. If we have no information about the wand, only an image, then is there any point? For instance, in an article about Snape's wand, we could mention that Voldemort believed Snape to be the master of the Elder Wand since he killed Dumbledore. But what is there to say about Cho's wand, for instance? Oread (talk) 01:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
couple more links;

Bellatrix's wand: http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7976&catid=21 Mad Eye's wand: http://www.noblecollection.com/catalog/product.cfm?id=NN7270&catid=21 Darth Jadious 10:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)