Wikia

Harry Potter Wiki

Changes: Forum:Hands

Edit

Back to page

Line 3: Line 3:
 
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
 
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
 
No, this is not a forum about the part of the anatomy, and nor is it for the silver hand that was made for [[Peter Pettigrew]]. It is about the [[wand]] gestures used for spells, and which ones we should be listening to.<br />The [[Levitation Charm]] in particular is a good example of this; as can be noted from the [[Talk:Levitation Charm|talk page]], there is confusion about which one is accurate.<br />For that spell, although the [[Harry Potter (book series)|books]] give a "swish and flick" motion (this is emphasised in [[Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone|the first book]]), ''[[Wonderbook: Book of Spells]]'' gives the hand motion as a "J" motion, and ''[[Pottermore]]'' shows it as a rather absurd squiggle:<br />[[File:Levitation-charm.png]]<br />And so it is also with the [[Engorgement Charm]], [[Fire-Making Spell]], [[Mending Charm]], and [[Severing Charm]], just to name a few.<br />And then to make matters more confusing, whilst most writings coming directly from [[J. K. Rowling]] are almost all "point" and "wave", we have two other sources, both supposedly coming directly from her, giving us odd squiggles and shapes.<br />So which one should we be advised by? I bring this matter to the community in the hopes that a consensus can soon be reached. This is, despite what others may say, a serious issue. --'''<span style="font-size:9pt;line-height:0.56cm;">[[User:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="4" color="Black">Hunniebunn</font>]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="4" color="Black">talk</font>]])</span>''' 21:44, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 
No, this is not a forum about the part of the anatomy, and nor is it for the silver hand that was made for [[Peter Pettigrew]]. It is about the [[wand]] gestures used for spells, and which ones we should be listening to.<br />The [[Levitation Charm]] in particular is a good example of this; as can be noted from the [[Talk:Levitation Charm|talk page]], there is confusion about which one is accurate.<br />For that spell, although the [[Harry Potter (book series)|books]] give a "swish and flick" motion (this is emphasised in [[Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone|the first book]]), ''[[Wonderbook: Book of Spells]]'' gives the hand motion as a "J" motion, and ''[[Pottermore]]'' shows it as a rather absurd squiggle:<br />[[File:Levitation-charm.png]]<br />And so it is also with the [[Engorgement Charm]], [[Fire-Making Spell]], [[Mending Charm]], and [[Severing Charm]], just to name a few.<br />And then to make matters more confusing, whilst most writings coming directly from [[J. K. Rowling]] are almost all "point" and "wave", we have two other sources, both supposedly coming directly from her, giving us odd squiggles and shapes.<br />So which one should we be advised by? I bring this matter to the community in the hopes that a consensus can soon be reached. This is, despite what others may say, a serious issue. --'''<span style="font-size:9pt;line-height:0.56cm;">[[User:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="4" color="Black">Hunniebunn</font>]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="4" color="Black">talk</font>]])</span>''' 21:44, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
----
+
:I would say the last published should be the used source. <span style="border:1px solid #E56717;">[[User:Harry granger|<font style="background:#F75D59;color:gold;">&nbsp;'''Harry granger'''&nbsp;</font>]][[User talk:Harry granger|<font style="background:yellow;color:black;">&nbsp;''' Talk&nbsp;'''</font>]]<font style="background:yellow;color:;">&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Harry granger|<font style="background: #99CCFF;color:#993300;">&nbsp;'''contribs'''</font>]]<font style="background: #99CCFF;color:#993300;"> </font></font></span> 21:51, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
I would say the last published should be the used source. <span style="border:1px solid #E56717;">[[User:Harry granger|<font style="background:#F75D59;color:gold;">&nbsp;'''Harry granger'''&nbsp;</font>]][[User talk:Harry granger|<font style="background:yellow;color:black;">&nbsp;''' Talk&nbsp;'''</font>]]<font style="background:yellow;color:;">&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Harry granger|<font style="background: #99CCFF;color:#993300;">&nbsp;'''contribs'''</font>]]<font style="background: #99CCFF;color:#993300;"> </font></font></span> 21:51, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
+
::That's true; in which case, we'd be using ''[[Wonderbook: Book of Spells|Wonderbook]]''. I wonder, will that be the overall vote {{C|This is my rather failing attempt to impersonate the host of ''Jeapordy'', a popular television show in Canada and [[United States of America|the U.S.A.]]}}--<span style="font-size:9pt;line-height:0.56cm;">[[User:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="3" color="Black">This is an automatically sent message.</font>]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="3" color="Black">You can reply here</font>]]) 21:59, November 19, 2012 (UTC) </span>
----
+
:::I'd go with the latest info, but make sure that stuff isn't being removed - whatever we had before needs to be going into Behind the scenes. [[User:ProfessorTofty|ProfessorTofty]] ([[User talk:ProfessorTofty|talk]]) 22:01, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
That's true; in which case, we'd be using ''[[Wonderbook: Book of Spells|Wonderbook]]''. I wonder, will that be the overall vote {{C|This is my rather failing attempt to impersonate the host of ''Jeapordy'', a popular television show in Canada and [[United States of America|the U.S.A.]]}}--<span style="font-size:9pt;line-height:0.56cm;">[[User:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="3" color="Black">This is an automatically sent message.</font>]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="3" color="Black">You can reply here</font>]]) 21:59, November 19, 2012 (UTC) </span>
+
::::Well, I would have done so immediately but apparently we need three for a vote, and so far we only have two. I personally am supporting using the books' motions, as they are in my mind the "most canon". All the same, if ''Wonderbook'' does rule out (two so far) then I'll make sure not to remove anything entirely. --<span style="font-size:9pt;line-height:0.56cm;">[[User:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="3" color="Black">This is an automatically sent message.</font>]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="3" color="Black">You can reply here</font>]]) 22:04, November 19, 2012 (UTC)</span>
:I'd go with the latest info, but make sure that stuff isn't being removed - whatever we had before needs to be going into Behind the scenes. [[User:ProfessorTofty|ProfessorTofty]] ([[User talk:ProfessorTofty|talk]]) 22:01, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
+
:::::I agree with Tofty but I think that the original instructions should be mentioned as aan alternative action as well [[User:ZRSFizzyBongs|<font face="Viner Hand ITC" size="5" color="#01C5BB">ZRS Fizzy Bongs</font>]] [[User talk:ZRSFizzyBongs|<font face="Vivaldi" size="3" color="#91219E">(Accio Owl! Send Owl!)</font>]]
----
 
Well, I would have done so immediately but apparently we need three for a vote, and so far we only have two. I personally am supporting using the books' motions, as they are in my mind the "most canon". All the same, if ''Wonderbook'' does rule out (two so far) then I'll make sure not to remove anything entirely. --<span style="font-size:9pt;line-height:0.56cm;">[[User:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="3" color="Black">This is an automatically sent message.</font>]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="3" color="Black">You can reply here</font>]]) 22:04, November 19, 2012 (UTC)</span>
 
   
+
::::::Well, that makes three. I'll get on it if anyone wants to help me. --<span style="font-size:9pt;line-height:0.56cm;">[[User:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="3" color="Black">This is an automatically sent message.</font>]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|<font face="Times" size="3" color="Black">You can reply here</font>]]) 22:07, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
I agree with Tofty but I think that the original instructions should be mentioned as aan alternative action as well [[User:ZRSFizzyBongs|<font face="Viner Hand ITC" size="5" color="#01C5BB">ZRS Fizzy Bongs</font>]] [[User talk:ZRSFizzyBongs|<font face="Vivaldi" size="3" color="#91219E">(Accio Owl! Send Owl!)</font>]]
 

Revision as of 22:07, November 19, 2012

Forums: Index > The Wizengamot > Hands


No, this is not a forum about the part of the anatomy, and nor is it for the silver hand that was made for Peter Pettigrew. It is about the wand gestures used for spells, and which ones we should be listening to.
The Levitation Charm in particular is a good example of this; as can be noted from the talk page, there is confusion about which one is accurate.
For that spell, although the books give a "swish and flick" motion (this is emphasised in the first book), Wonderbook: Book of Spells gives the hand motion as a "J" motion, and Pottermore shows it as a rather absurd squiggle:
Levitation-charm
And so it is also with the Engorgement Charm, Fire-Making Spell, Mending Charm, and Severing Charm, just to name a few.
And then to make matters more confusing, whilst most writings coming directly from J. K. Rowling are almost all "point" and "wave", we have two other sources, both supposedly coming directly from her, giving us odd squiggles and shapes.
So which one should we be advised by? I bring this matter to the community in the hopes that a consensus can soon be reached. This is, despite what others may say, a serious issue. --Hunniebunn (talk) 21:44, November 19, 2012 (UTC)

I would say the last published should be the used source.  Harry granger   Talk   contribs 21:51, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
That's true; in which case, we'd be using Wonderbook. I wonder, will that be the overall vote (This is my rather failing attempt to impersonate the host of Jeapordy, a popular television show in Canada and the U.S.A.)--This is an automatically sent message. (You can reply here) 21:59, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
I'd go with the latest info, but make sure that stuff isn't being removed - whatever we had before needs to be going into Behind the scenes. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:01, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
Well, I would have done so immediately but apparently we need three for a vote, and so far we only have two. I personally am supporting using the books' motions, as they are in my mind the "most canon". All the same, if Wonderbook does rule out (two so far) then I'll make sure not to remove anything entirely. --This is an automatically sent message. (You can reply here) 22:04, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
I agree with Tofty but I think that the original instructions should be mentioned as aan alternative action as well ZRS Fizzy Bongs (Accio Owl! Send Owl!)
Well, that makes three. I'll get on it if anyone wants to help me. --This is an automatically sent message. (You can reply here) 22:07, November 19, 2012 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki