Category talk:Candidates for deletion/Archive 11

Please discuss candidates for deletion here

Archived discussions

Lists of archived discussions and their results. Sorted by year in which the discussion started.

• Archive 1 (2007)
• Archive 2 (2008)
• Archive 3 (2009)
• Archive 4 (2010)
• Archive 5 (2011)
  • Johnpaul Castrianni
  • Tsunami
  • Unidentified lethal curse

Current discussions

Studying girls

Studying girls has been a candidate for deletion for over a month. Any input on whether it should be deleted or not? --Texthawm ^{(Owl Me)} 23:16, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

I think it should be deleted. There is no specification of who these girls are so its not important enough to keep.

Ginny101 00:34, October 11, 2011 (UTC)

Dobby's shoes

An absolutely bizarre and pointless article. All it says is that Dobby owned a pair of shoes after being freed by the Malfoy's. If this stays, then we'll be seeing articles like "Ron's wellington boots" and "Hermione's spare Hogwarts robes" appearing soon. 82.42.249.145 17:03, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

I disagree, I think articles should be made for clothing only if it's useful and the clothing is memorable in the film. By useful, I mean it explained to some who may not know about the difference they saw in Dobby's atire in Part 1. And if they look at Dobby's clothes, it's linked in case they want to know more about it. *Luna^{(I suspect Nargles are behind it...)} 18:02, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

No other character has an article for a non-significant piece of their clothing. Keeping this article would be like having one for Ron Weasley's robes or Hermione's coat. I agree that it is fairly pointless.--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 20:10, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Luna, you say it is linked in case they want to know more about it. That would be fair enough, but the article doesn't give any more information about it. It just says he owned a pair of shoes. That's it. 82.42.249.145 19:52, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

It is major step owning clothes though for Dobby as it shows he is free. I think this page should be kept.Happydementor 16:18, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

It would seem, in any case, that the decision was keep. The article doesn't have a delete tag on it anymore and hasn't in months. ProfessorTofty 01:21, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Christian Simpson as Old Fred Weasley

I don't know if this source is good enough. It's your decision. source: http://scificonventionsigners.weebly.com/christian-j-simpson.html Harry granger 18:34, June 28, 2011 (UTC)

Training grounds way to Quidditch Pitch.

This entrance is NOT the Trainings Grounds Tower like you said. This is the Trainings Grounds tower:

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lestrange97 (talk • contribs).Lestrange97 16:18, September 28, 2011 (UTC)

Still looks a lot like the same building, or a slightly different design of it to me. The Training Grounds Way image looks to be from one of the games and there are lots of differences between building designs in the games and movies. Shorty1982 15:40, September 28, 2011 (UTC)

Oh came on, Training Grounds Tower is so so much bigger than the other, look to the photo of Aerial Viez of the Greenhouses, and you will see where is the building I say.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lestrange97 (talk • contribs).Lestrange97 16:18, September 28, 2011 (UTC)

From what I can see they are at least extremely similar, if not the same. The community will make the final decision. Please always sign talk page entries with 4 tildes (~). -Shorty1982 16:06, September 28, 2011 (UTC)

And, Thank you by your opinion Lestrange97 16:18, September 28, 2011 (UTC)

Charity Burbage's wand. I think it should be deleted because it is a fanon. No one knows what her wand is, it never mentions it. Why should he have a page for something he doesnt know exists when fanons are being deleted?

AmbroseLestrange502 02:24, October 9, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified female snatcher at the Battle of Hogwarts

What I can not understand, is why there are pages like Unidentified 1996 quidditch spectator students, that don't have any images, and this page, that also, this woman is the only know female Snatcher, can not be in the wiki. Lestrange97 20:22, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

But I do not understand why there may be other pages that do not even have a photo and is not already a party, is one of the few women that are Snatcher.

The article you mentioned is also a candidate for deletion. The fact that this Snatcher is a woman in no way justifies having an article about her. There were hundreads of Snatchers at the Battle of Hogwarts, many of them female. Unless you propose having articles on each and every one of them your argument is somewhat feeble. Jayden Matthews 20:30, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified Hogwarts student who fought against a Death Eater with a golden spell

I think that this page is quite interesting, as a Priori Incantatem may have occured, and this is quite rare. --

Octopus

Tom Marvolo Octopus

16:29, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

This should stay, as there is a picture and he is duelling a Death Eater. He appeared, making him notable.

This should not be deleted it is asimple fun page for anyone to look and have fun.

MissHowelly 17:46, November 8, 2011 (UTC)

Underwear

While I've certainly been on record as having stricter standards for notability, in this case, I actually favor keep for the article. As with urine, just because certain subjects may seem juvenile or silly to some doesn't necessarily mean that makes them unworthy of an article. Additionally, the article seems to be well-sourced and deals in fact, rather than speculative information. ProfessorTofty 23:17, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. --  Seth Cooper  owl post! 23:58, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

no articles on Panties yet? :p --Cometstyles 01:00, December 1, 2011 (UTC)

I don't think the Underwear article should be deleted because we all wear underwear it might be considered taboo to talk about underwear but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't talk or write about underwear. Charmedh2ogirl 16:33, December 1, 2011 (UTC)

I agree with ProfessorTofty ; when it's done properly, hyperinclusionism is not a crime. If worded and sourced properly, we should keep it. LelalMekha 21:38, December 11, 2011 (UTC)

List of D.A.D.A. teachers

• Stated to be redundant, as we have page Category:Defence Against the Dark Arts Professors at Hogwarts. But page Category:Defence Against the Dark Arts Professors at Hogwarts does not list the DADA teachers in time order, and it brings together the information about them. Anthony Appleyard 09:09, December 6, 2011 (UTC)