Talk: Candidates for deletion/Archive 11

Revision as of 12:19, 23 February 2014

Please discuss candidates for deletion here

Archived discussions

Lists of archived discussions and their results. Sorted by year in which the discussion started.

Archive 1 (2007)
Archive 2 (2008)
Archive 3 (2009)
Archive 4 (2010)
- Minister for Magic individual infobox
Archive 5 (2011)
- Johnpaul Castrianni
- Tsunami
- Unidentified lethal curse
- Magical familiar
- Robert Ripley
Archive 6 (2012)
Archive 7 (2013)

Current discussions

This discussion is listed as an active talk page.
Please remove this template when the question has been answered.

Cane

Is this worthy of an article? I realize that we have articles on numerous generic things that appear in canon, but surely this is pushing it? Harry once threw a stick at either Crabbe or Goyle (can't quite recall which). Should we have an article on sticks? A line should be drawn somewhere. -- 1337star ^{(Drop me a line!)} 01:35, January 11, 2014 (UTC)

I think it should be redirected to "Walking stick", but wanted to ask someone/anyone else before doing so. --Hunnie Bunn (talk) 01:56, January 11, 2014 (UTC)

If you think that's unworthy, just notify there's random stuff like Unidentified bluebird and Unidentified Black Death Eater at the Battle of Hogwarts (II). Donut4 || TALK PAGE 14:00, January 12, 2014 (UTC)

The Existential Adulteration of Harry Potter

The Existential Adulteration of Harry Potter should be taken off the candidates for deletion list because, although not an official part of the canon, it does add an interesting element to the Potter series.

It is, in essence, Book 3.5. I found this book while browsing Potter books on Amazon, read it, and enjoyed it so much that I thought other Harry Potter fans should know about it. One should at least read the book before deeming it unrelated to Harry Potter and unworthy for this site.

Perhaps a special consideration should be made for this title due to its unique content and growing popularity.

Thank you for reading.

Dmoriarty (talk) 12:18, February 23, 2014 (UTC)

D. Moriarty

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 :I think it should be redirected to "Walking stick", but wanted to ask someone/anyone else before doing so. --[[User:Hunnie Bunn|Hunnie Bunn]] ([[User talk:Hunnie Bunn|talk]]) 01:56, January 11, 2014 (UTC)
 :If you think that's unworthy, just notify there's random stuff like [[Unidentified bluebird]] and [[Unidentified Black Death Eater at the Battle of Hogwarts (II)]]. [[User:Donut4|<b><font face="Arial Bold" size="4" color="Black">Donut4</font></b>]] || [[User talk:Donut4|<font face="Arial" size="4" color="Green">TALK PAGE</font>]] 14:00, January 12, 2014 (UTC)
+'''The Existential Adulteration of Harry Potter'''
+The Existential Adulteration of Harry Potter should be taken off the candidates for deletion list because, although not an official part of the canon, it does add an interesting element to the Potter series.
+It is, in essence, Book 3.5. I found this book while browsing Potter books on Amazon, read it, and enjoyed it so much that I thought other Harry Potter fans should know about it. One should at least read the book before deeming it unrelated to Harry Potter and unworthy for this site.
+Perhaps a special consideration should be made for this title due to its unique content and growing popularity.
+Thank you for reading.
+'''[[User:Dmoriarty|Dmoriarty]] ([[User talk:Dmoriarty|talk]]) 12:18, February 23, 2014 (UTC)'''
+'''D. Moriarty'''