Talk: Candidates for deletion/Archive 1

This is an archive of closed discussions from Category talk:Candidates for deletion. Please do not modify it. It is here for archival purposes only.

Curse of the Bogies

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Article was redirected. John Reaves (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

The article has no content, aside from the author saying that he doesn't know what the curse does (duh). I don't think there is even such a curse listed in the books. If someone can confirm this as the Bat-Bogey Hex, a redirect and write-up on said hex should be in order. The Chosen One ^{(Choose me!)} 08:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete. Not even useful as a redirect. The Bat-Bogey Hex has never been called "Curse of the Bogies." bibliomaniac ₁₅ 23:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Moldymort

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Deleted. John Reaves (talk) 18:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC) THIS IS A PIECE OF NONSENSE!!!WHO EVER HEARD OF A HARRY POTTER BOOK 8!!!!!!

Yeah Moldymort should be deleted even the guy who made this article said this was fake.-Hp7

Dragon-Pox

This article should be deleted or rewritten it says that this disease occurs usually on old people but Horace Slughorn said that it was surprising that Abraxas had this disease-User:Hp7

Batty Fuck Complete idiotical nonsense nuff said-Hp7

Pantalonius Poopicus This is made up this is not a real spell it says there that it causes your enmy to "soil" himself-Hp7

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

c. 1951?

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Deleted. John Reaves (talk) 18:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC) There has been a deletion candidacy placed on C. 1951 citing as reason "already have 1951" but "1951" is just a redirect to 1950s. If we're not going to create individual year articles in that decade then the redirects should be to 1950s...I do think that both a c. 1951 and a 1951 article would be overkill,the link should be "c. 1951" where there is some doubt as to an event's occurring in exactly that year.--Louis E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 05:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I agree, I felt that the article was overkill. If 1951 is the year we think it happened in it should just be placed in the 1951 article. The reason there is no seperate 1951 article right now is cause there isn't enough information so its just grouped into a decade. We probably should create seperate articles for each year, I think it's two seperate issues then and C. 1951 should still be deleted. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 21:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Glacius challenge, Black deeds challenge

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Deleted. John Reaves (talk) 18:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC) We may be many things, a wiki, an encyclopedia, a community of HP-lovers, but one thing we are not is a repository for walkthroughs or cheats for Harry Potter games, no matter how engrossing, interesting, or graphically advanced they may be. The Chosen One ^{(Choose me!)} 17:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Agreed..I believe its more suited for the Harry Potter Fanon then here..--Comet styles 19:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, well put! But yes, if anyone wants cheats or walkthroughs they should go to a site specifically for cheats and walkthroughs rather than a miscellaneous information site. --Littlesparrow 12:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Alrighty-o, I don't think anybody will oppose, other than the fans who posted the stuff in the first place. I have edited the policy page to include game cheats and walkthroughs in the "Delete on Sight" list - admins, please take note. Any objections, please post in the CommPortal. So, here goes (and there's another walkthrough about the crumple retraction challenge something or other, will get that too). The Chosen One ^{(Choose me!)} 15:43, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Apparition/Disapparition

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Article was merged and redirected. bibliomaniac ₁₅ 04:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Stub article that turns out to be a subpage. Deletion or merging would be best. bibliomaniac ₁₅ 00:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm thinking merging and redirecting to Apparation would be best. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 01:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Done. bibliomaniac ₁₅ 04:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Hufflepuff Domitories

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Article was deleted. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Pointless, one sentence, poorly written page. Dormitories isn't even spelled right. No relevant information.Ravenmaster 07:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

This article is very poorly written that even sweet Helga Hufflepuff be angry.-Hp7

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Mediwizard

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Article was kept, since it is separate from Healer. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

First, it should be healer, and second, it has basicly no content.Chris Chaud 19:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Your wrong. There is a difference between a Healer and a Mediwizard. A Healer works at St.Mungos, while a Mediwizard is a field doctor. For example, at the Quidditch Game, and at the first challenge of the Tri Wizard cup. Just because it has almost no content, doesn't mean we should delete it. If you want a encylopedia, you need everything. If you delete this, then your encylopedia is no complete. It can be merged with healer, if you think thats a good idea.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Cho Chang and Harry Potter

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Article was deleted. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

This article could be merged with Cho Chang and Harry Potter if verifable.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Harry Potter News

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Harry Potter News now redirects to Harry Potter Wiki:Daily Prophet news - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm certainly annoyed that Manticore tagged this for deletion! It's rather obvious to me that material newly released about the series or fandom needs a place to be reported...and where better?--Louis E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 03:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Harry Potter News is posted on the main page. Lemniwinks

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Recent deletion tags to images

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Deletion tags were removed by JohnReaves. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Recently, an anon has listed several image files with deletion tags for lack of copyright information. Can we just provide the information if known and remove the tags? Obviously some of the pictures are promotional images or screencaps and can be listed as such, but I didn't want to just go ahead with it and remove deletion tags since this is usually considered as vandalism. Alternatively, we can reupload the images with proper copyright tags. Needless to say, we would lose some high quality images if they were deleted, and I don't think we want that to happen. - Cavalier One 07:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Stupefius Maximus

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Article was deleted since it was unverified. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I can find no canon evidence in the books, films or games for this spell. I even looked through the HP Lexicon's list of spells for it and found nothing. Can anyone provide a source for it? If not, it will be deleted. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 07:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Wotcher

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Redirected to Slang terms - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I have recently placed a delete tag on this article and wish to open a discussion around it. Does it deserve its own article as a slang term? Or should we create a Slang page and place all known slang into it? - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 07:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm thinking that maybe we should keep this one. After all there should be room in this wiki for even the smallest pieces of the HP universe. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 12:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

See, the only thing is that "Wotcher" (or some variation thereof eg. "Wotcha") is quite common to some British folk such as myself as a greeting. It is not HP specific. If we allow Wotcher to remain, we should expand and create Blimey, Crikey, Sod, and all the other little British words from the book. And if we do that, then we could umbrella the whole page under something like "British terminology". - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 10:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Didn't know that. Remove it. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 13:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't think we need page here on it. We could redirect those pages to a page that is a soft redirect to the Wikipedia article (en:wp:British slang). John Reaves (talk) 18:32, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Wotcher is a completely foreign term to me other than in the HP series. Taking into account what everyone has said here, I think John Reaves' solution makes the most sense. Mafalda Hopkirk 20:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Just for the record -- wikipedia:British slang does not have an entry for "Wotcher". Also Git was created which I believe will have the same thing happen to it as Wotcher. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 03:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

DarkJedi613, we had a little discussion about this over at Forum:Slang Page. I think the concensus is to create a page to deal with all British slang, and link to there from articles. Being British myself, I will be taking an active role while rereading the books for other projects on the wiki. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 12:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I know that there is some debate, but this has been on debate for at least a month. I think that it should be deleted or taken off the delete debate. I also support a slang page22:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Harry Potter Fantic 1

I had never heard Wotcher before, so I just ignored it in the book. As far as Git goes, I created the page, so of course I am biased. I though it needed an article because of the prolific amount of times it was used in the series. I think it was used over 200 times in one book alone. Having said that, If you wanted to make a "british slang terms used in Harry Potter" article and merge them all into one, that would be fair. I don't like redirecting to wikipedia, and I think it would be nice to have an article that includes ONLY the slang used in the series. IthinkIwannaLeia

Already created at Slang Terms. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 12:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Strangling

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The Strangling page is, i'm sorry, absolutely stupid. Why not have a page for walking and talking? Am i missing something? Mafalda Hopkirk 00:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I don't get that page. -Matoro183 ^(Talk) 01:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

I agree ... we either don't link to it, or link to the Wikipedia entry on Strangling. I'm for deletion, followed by linking to Wikipedia. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 03:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Riderwood

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Just came across this article. Does it have any merit here? Is just a copy of a news article! - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

If it was expanded I think it might have merit. But in its current state, no. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 13:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 03:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Tara Gilesbie

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Harry Potter Fantic 1 has requested deletion of this page, and upon reviewing it, I would tend to agree. However, since I am not active in the fan fiction community (or even read it), I want to know if there is any reason to keep the article, and if this individual is noteworthy enough to be on this wiki. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 23:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I think this is a really, really inappropriate article and just encourages internet bullying. Who knows who this person is. She could be six years old for all we know, and it could be considered harassment. Mafalda Hopkirk 08:50, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Mafalda, you have some good reasoning there, and I honestly hadn't thought of that. For the reasons listed above, I'm deleting the article. If any of my fellow admins disagree, please let me know. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 14:50, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

13½", Yew, phoenix feather core

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

I'm for deletion of this article -- its unnecessary and I don't think there is much that could be expanded on besides what is in the article. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 14:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Information should be merged with Tom Riddle/ Lord Voldemort. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 14:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I think its all in there already. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 14:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

In that case, delete. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 14:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 14:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

SPoT

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Personally, I feel that this article about a specific section of the HP fandom is not notable enough to include in this wiki. If we allow one subset of fans their own page, then we have to do it for all fan groups, and that will clog up the wiki with fan/ vanity pages. Thoughts on this? - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 01:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I totally agree, I don't belive any fanon should be aloued on this wiki, but I know you allow some i.e. Wizard Rock, but this is nowhere near notable enough, I hadn't even heard of it!Harry Potter Fantic 1 02:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Harry Potter Fantic 1

This is just a bid for internet fame or advertising for that site and i think this is the wrong place for it. Besides it isn't written in encyclopedic format. Mafalda Hopkirk 09:22, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Go ahead and Delete, we found a diffrent wikia. I just wanted to point out that 1. We aren't trying to get internet fame since we already have it. 2. We aren't advertising for a site, we don't want others to join. We have been asked why we didn't have a wikia site by someone who had heard of us (you might even call them a fan!) and we went ahead with the idea. Firehawk905 14:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 23:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Harry Potter Book 8?

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

This article should be deleted.Me_Potter_Fan 03:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

More appropriate as a forum topic, not an article. Mafalda Hopkirk 07:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:38, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Harry Potter and The Order of The Phoenix (seen only in photo)

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

This Pages realy needs to be deleted because it serves no point.Me_Potter_Fan 22:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I already deleted it. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 22:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Movie 6

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

It should be a forum topic, not an article. Mafalda Hopkirk 18:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done

-- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 19:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Opinionated Truth about Snape

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

This is either fandom or a forum topic. Mafalda Hopkirk 22:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 23:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Pikachu

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

No further comment. Mafalda Hopkirk 05:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Gone..Comet styles 05:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Mutilated baby

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Article was merged - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

This article should be deleted. It's disgusting and offensive. There is nothing more to write about the "mutilated baby" that appears at King's Cross other than this one paragraph, so having an article entitled "mutilated baby" seems vulgar and obsolete. Mafalda Hopkirk 08:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Check comments on the talk page for possible solution. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Timeline

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

It is copied from an outside source. Note the missing clickable links such as "TOP" Mafalda Hopkirk 02:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. Looks like it was taken from the HP Lexicon. However, a cohesive, originally written timeline might not be a bad idea. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't the dates pages make up a timeline? Mafalda Hopkirk 14:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes. But I think he means an overall timeline of what happened, that would then link to dates and events with more information about each. Like this. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 14:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Precisely. Or branch of into other, more detailed articles like battle articles, event articles, etc. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 14:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Shyla Maharaj

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Fanon page. Mafalda Hopkirk 09:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Deleted and User warned. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 10:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Snape's Worst Memory

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Just the page isn't needed. Mafalda Hopkirk 19:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Famous Witches and Wizard Cards/tabledraft

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

I fixed the coding so the tabledraft page isn't needed anymore. Mafalda Hopkirk 07:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Members of the Order of the Phoenix

(from discussion page)Do we really need a page with links to categories about the Order of the Phoenix? We have all the members listed at Order of the Phoenix anyway, and characters are categorised by whether or not they were in the first or second orders. And, by deleting, we eliminate an Orphaned Page. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 14:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

If all the info is located on the main article then I don't see the need for a second page. Mafalda Hopkirk 20:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

As noted, I'm for deletion of this article. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Grandmother Remus

1. Her first and last name can never be known 2. Her first name is not Grandmother and her last name is not Remus - Remus is Lupin's first name. 3. How can her blood status ever be determined? Mafalda Hopkirk 17:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Deleted - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Grandfather Remus

1. His first and last name can never be known 2. His first name is not Grandfather and his last name is not Remus - Remus is Lupin's first name. 3. How can his blood status ever be determined? Mafalda Hopkirk 17:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Deleted - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Magic Ancestor

Fanon. Mafalda Hopkirk 17:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Deleted - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Goblin ancestor

Fanon. Mafalda Hopkirk 17:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Deleted - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

John Lupin

Fanon. Mafalda Hopkirk 17:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Deleted - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Remus Jhon Lupin

Not a typo. Duplicate page of Remus Lupin. Mafalda Hopkirk 17:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Deleted - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Dave Legeno

Unless this person is going to act in future HP movies it has nothing to do with HP. Mafalda Hopkirk 22:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

According to The Leaky Cauldron, he is rumoured to be playing Fenrir Greyback in Half-Blood Prince. Cleaned up and kept for now, but will be deleted if it proves false. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 23:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Article was deleted - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

What does the bottom of the book one means

Not a typo. Garbage. Mafalda Hopkirk 03:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Vandalism?

There has recently been the addition (by 66.245.29.175) of all these pages of characters who, from what I can tell, are not from the HP series at all. They are all listed as "Muggles". I think they may be characters from the television show Heroes, but I'm not familiar enough with it to be sure. I've tagged a few for deletion, but I think they're all vandalism. 24.141.82.173 23:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

They were all Heroes character, yep. Great show but not welcome here. All deleted. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified student

I just think that this article is not necessary. The character doesn't exist in the books, and has a very minor role in the movie. The title is not very "professional", and it is just not a good article. Freakatone 17:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Got to go with Keep on this one. He's a notable addition to the movies, is arguably as important and noticable as Nigel, and just because he isn't in the books is no reason not to include him on the wiki. This wiki covers all aspects of the HP universe, from the books to the games. Also, while the title may not be "professional", it is accurate. Also, the character reportedly has garner a small amount of interest within certain elements of the fan community. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 17:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Cavlier One. He's a character -- no matter how small. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 16:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

yeah, you guys are right, after re-watching the movie, he is a way more important character than I remembered him to be. Freakatone 16:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Harry Potter & Cho Chang

This article could be merged with Cho Chang and Harry Potter if verifable.

All info was merged so the page itself can be deleted. Mafalda Hopkirk 12:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 09:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Mafalda

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Mafalda didn't make it into the final copy of the books. Should we keep the article anyway? I personally don't think we should. --Freakatone 16:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep. Even though she didn't make it into the books, she was important enough for JK to put the information on her site. We should be striving to include all information. Also, please read our Canon policy - in the examples of usage section, there is a small piece on Mafalda and her status within Canon. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 17:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Part of the article is about her role in the series. In the Wiki:Canon it says that her role in the book is non-canon. Should it be deleted? --Freakatone 18:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

The information shouldn't be deleted, but the article should be overhauled to move all the stuff that couldn't have happened into a Behind the scenes section with appropriate links to JK Rowling's website. Also, there appears to be a lot of speculation in the article. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 18:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

A little late I think, but just throwing in my support for keeping it. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 01:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep. I've done my best to try to tidy up the article and arrange everything so that it's clear the character is not canonical. Malfalda was created by J.K. Rowling, and played a very large role in an early draft of one of the books, so I think that she's certainly a lot closer to canon than original characters from the films and video games. -Starstuff 00:20, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Rynn Riddle, Jenny Riddle, Emma-jane cosgrove

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

They're just empty pages, with no useful or canonical information. It just feels like fanon someone added to vandalise the wiki. --Cubs Fan2007 18:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Done

Crazy stuff. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 20:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

April 1

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

I just don't think this page is needed. Mafalda Hopkirk 03:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree. If we keep this page we would have to create pages for the other character's birthdays. Dumblydoor 15:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

But, we do have pages for a lot of birthdays. I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be deleted. C Teng 20:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

What page do we have for any birthdays? -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 20:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Done-- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 19:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Wizarding genetics

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

(copied from talk page) I think we should merge this with Blood Purity, and have Blood Purity be the main article. Mafalda Hopkirk 05:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't think it's even needed. It contains too much Original Research, and none of the article is backed up by any evidence from the series. - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 08:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Yea i think it should be merged with blood purity as it is interesting! Icthlarin 06:53, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Is any of that page backed by any official source (or any outside source)? Or is it all conjectural and assumed? -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 20:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Done-- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 16:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Magical Tournaments

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article seems unnessary since the only magical tournaments mentioned in Canon are the Triwizard Tournament and the Quidditch World Cup, both of which have their own articles. Keeping it will only serve as a "list page" linking to the two aforementioned articles. Thoughts? - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 16:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done

-- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 16:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Nyroc Oherena

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

This character is a fanon, and should be deleted. --Freakatone 23:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. One of our resident admins will probably see to that when they log on next. -Starstuff 23:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

DoneComet styles 01:29, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Whimsic Alley

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Deleted. -- Freakatone ^Talk 00:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC) The page seems to be little more than an advert for a real shop - why is it here? - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 08:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I think its cause if specializies in HP merchandise? I remember it being added, but I don't know anything about it. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 15:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

If it's well known, they it has a valid claim to stay. It needs to be majorly cleaned up and NPOVed though because it reads like an advertisement at the moment. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 15:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Gone. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 15:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Done

Kill Harry

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Page was deleted. -- Freakatone ^Talk 11:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I dont think that we need this because I think it is fanon, but I don't know. - Tyminator1 (Talk) 13:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree! Mafalda Hopkirk 13:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

It's not fanon, but it is fan fiction. The question is, is it notable enough to be included? - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 14:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Ive never heard about it till now so i consider it to be not notable enough.Me_Potter_Fan 23:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't think it should be deleted; It's a relevent parody, and I didn't know about it until reading that particular page. Safe 19:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete ts is useless rubbish! Icthlarin 06:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC) Done -- Freakatone ^Talk 23:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Category - Non-Canonical Spells

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Page was deleted. -- Freakatone ^Talk 11:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

There is just one page with every non-canonical spell on it now. I think the group should be deleted. Mafalda Hopkirk 08:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Done

-- Freakatone ^Talk 11:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Category:Joke names

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Article was deleted. -- Freakatone ^Talk 00:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I think that the function of this category is better served by the "Behind the scenes" sections found in most articles. JKR is rather clever when it comes to naming things, so most everything in her series is a pun, and I don't think having a category like this will really help anyone pick up on the jokes they might have missed. -Starstuff 09:18, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Done

-- Freakatone ^Talk 00:37, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

File:600px-Yes check.svg.png Done -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 15:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

List of minor Hogwarts students

I believe this page should be changed to a category...-Matoro183 ^(Talk) 23:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree. --Freakatone 00:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm fine with that. Go for it. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 02:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm okay with this idea too. -Starstuff 09:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Herbivicus

Has been added to Non-canonical spells-Matoro183 ^(Talk) 13:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

No. Non-canonical spells needs to be split into individual articles. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 14:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

~~::Alright, then I'll remove the delete tag-Matoro183 ^(Talk) 19:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)~~

Beat you to it. :) -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 22:05, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Done. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 03:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

The article's name is mispelled. Already exists an article with the right name (Verdimillious). Seth Cooper 03:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Wrackspurt

There is other pages about creatures that don't exsist, so I don't see why this page needs to be deleted. There's nothing to say that mythical creatures can't have a page. Palmala 6 July

I removed the template. I'm thinking maybe we could have use another category besides "Creatures" for made up creatures. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 19:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Good idea, there are quite a few that are classed as creatures but have no prove of being real. Palmala 20:37, 6 July 2008

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Done -- Freakatone ^Talk 17:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

List of Harry Potter characters

This seems a little too...wikipedian. Why do we need categories if we don't use them instead of this article?--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 11:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Having a list of characters underimines the real world perspective of the wiki. It's gotta go. - –K.A.J^{•T•C•E•} 15:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Deleted -- Freakatone ^Talk 20:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Farting Curse

Their is no evidence that this is real anywhere. Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 10:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Kept -- Freakatone ^Talk 11:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Dog

Dog needs to be kept. There are dogs in the wizrding world.--Matoro183 ^(Talk) 10:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Deleted. -- Freakatone ^Talk 01:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Half-Vampire

I can't recall ever hearing this term in canon. Lorcan d'Eath is referred to as part-vampire, not half-vampire. Also, there's no evidence that Rufus Scrimgeour is half-vampire. The only thing that comes close is Luna speculating that he is a vampire at one point. Oread 21:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm thinking Merge with part-vampire and delete (or maybe redirect?) -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 18:26, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Deleted -- Freakatone ^Talk 00:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

File:Itachi1.jpg

do I really need to say why? Me_Potter_Fan ^(Talk) 00:32, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Deleted --Matoro183^(Talk) 11:36, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Vorlage: Zitat

That was my mistake. I wanted to do this into the german wiki. Can be deleted.--Rodolphus 11:33, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

The Half-Blood Prince List - I disagree with this canadate. This is known information and such f what we are getting in the movie. Please reconsider. I am improving it, it just takes a while, as it is a big page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChaosMaster16 (talk • contribs).

I think it should be deleted, with any relevant information moved to the Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (film) article. There's a special thanks section at the end as well, which is completely unencyclopedic. Oread 15:27, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Its a completely worthless article, it adds nothing to the wiki, and it's totally unencyclopedic. –K.A.J^{•T•C•E•} 15:49, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Done. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 16:26, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Not Deleted --Matoro183^(Talk) 20:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Harry Potter's scar

Deletion template placed by Oread on 21st December, removed by You-Know-Who on the same date. The template should not have been removed - if an article is believed to be worthy of deletion by one party, it must be discussed and the community consensus heeded. Deletion notice claims information is a repetition of information already in the Harry Potter article, and as such does not need its own article. - Cavalier One^{(Wizarding Wireless Network)} 15:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

My actions is the result of my ignorance and because i am new here, and i am VERY SORRY for that. My main reason why i created the Harry Potter's scar Article is because that portion of the story is also important to me. And I'm thinking also that it would be help for others who will search for that article and instead to read the entire Harry Potter main article. - You-Know-Who--You-Know-Who 16:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm not dead-set against this article — the scar is quite important to the series — but it seems rather arbitrary to me. The scar is a part of Harry. We don't have separate articles for Peter Pettigrew's silver hand, or Moody's wooden leg or eye. And all of those are separate objects on their own, artificial replacements; Harry's scar may be inbued with magical peculiarities, but it is still very much a part of him. It's inconsistent. Also, as I said in the original tag, the article does not present any information that isn't already present in the Harry Potter article.

However, I agree that some people may want to read about the scar without having to look at the entire Harry Potter article, which is rather long. Oread 17:34, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I added some quotes from the series (films and book) that gives additional information about Harry Potter's scar, to give discuss expansion about the scar, and i believe it is very annoying if it is read or to input in Harry Potter's main article.--You-Know-Who 19:29, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

i think, i'll change the title to "lightning scar" instead of "Harry Potter's scar". --You-Know-Who 01:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

The article now does seem to have more information that would clutter the Harry Potter article, so I can see the argument for keeping it, but I still think there is a consistency issue. However, I'm going to move the article back to its original name. "Lightning scar" sounds as if it is a scar caused by lightning. If the title was going to be based on the shape of the scar, it would have to be "Lightning bolt-shaped scar". "Harry Potter's scar" is the most specific. Oread 05:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Recently, i move the article to "Lightning scar" the reason is because, that is not the only scar that Harry's got in the series. I realize it when i re-read the Order of the Phoenix and watched the movie too. Harry also got scar on his hand, remember? When Dolores Umbridge punish him in her office. In the book, it resulted as a scar. it was mentioned as "white scar" to be exact.
For this reason, We can still use the Lightning scar as the title, as if it is only mentioned in the series referring to the scar on Harry's forehead. What do you think, moderators? --You-Know-Who 05:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

While Harry Potter Wiki has had articles on personal possessions for some time, until the article on Harry's scar was created, we didn't have an article about a specific physical feature. I can understand having an article on a physical feature if it's unique and relevant to the plot, like Harry's scar, or if it's an example of a magical device not seen elsewhere in the series, like Moody's false eye or Pettigrew's silver hand. We definitely need to revise our notability guidelines if we plan on accepting articles of this type. We don't need stuff like "Severus Snape's nose," "Lily Evans' eyes," and "Ronald Weasley's freckles" popping up.

I agree with You-Know-Who that the title "Harry Potter's scar" is kind of ambiguous. The only alternatives I can think of are "Harry Potter's lightning bolt-shaped scar" and "Harry Potter's forehead scar." ★ Starstuff ^{(Owl me!)} 04:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Don't compare Harry Potter's scar to Severus Snape's snose or Lily Evan's eyes. Harry's scar is very different and very very important to the story so i decided to create this article, it so dissapointing that in the Harry Potter encyclopedia like this, having very lack of information. Some pages are look disgusting and very annoying to the eyes while reading it. That is the one reason why i joined here, to help... --You-Know-Who 09:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm not suggesting Harry's scar isn't important in the books or that we shouldn't have an article on it. I'm only saying that having an article on a notable physical feature like Harry's scar could possibly lead someone to create one or more articles on features that aren't all that relevant to the story. People might have different interpretations of what is important to the story, though, which is why I brought up Lily's eyes, because they're mentioned several times throughout the books and do play a significant symbolic role. As for Ron's freckles and Snape's nose, I just threw those in as examples of articles someone might create as a joke, if they saw the article on Harry's scar and came to the conclusion that our standards of notability must not be very high. Which is why I said I think we need to lay out some notablity rules. It will help to prevent misunderstandings. Also it will help to resolve the consistency concerns which Oread expressed above. ★ Starstuff ^{(Owl me!)} 10:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Yah! Yah, now i got your point or what you are trying to say Starstuff, and i agree with you. --You-Know-Who 16:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Not deleted --Matoro183^(Talk) 18:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

January 12

Deletion Template placed by Hollyfire on the 2nd of March, 2009, because this is a pointless article.

There is no reason to delete the January 12 article. We have been trying to create articles for all dates for some time now. Oread ^(talk) 18:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Deleted --Matoro183^(Talk) 23:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Category:Stupid people

Deletion Template placed by Hellabore on the 29th of March, 2009, because this is off topic.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Deleted --Matoro183^(Talk) 23:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Half-Blood Prince's Textbook

Deletion Template placed by Hellabore on the 29th of March, 2009, because there is another page that talks about subject

I redirected it to a appropriate subject/article/page. --ÈnŔîčö^{(Send me an Owl)} 05:23, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived discussion. Please do not modify it.

Not Deleted --Matoro183^(Talk) 14:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

File:HP6-TRLF5-0667.jpg

I already uploaded the image and titled File:Fake Horcrux Locket.jpg, but User:Smonocco wants to delete the one that i uploaded because of the new one uploaded by User:Matoro183 titled as File:HP6-TRLF5-0667.jpg, but i preferred to use Appropriate Title for files. --ÈnŔîčö ^{(Send me an Owl!)} 10:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

They're not the same image. Yours is a close-up.--Matoro183^(Talk) 11:16, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Please link to the files, it makes it way easier. Its not a duplicate, and just cause its not in use doesn't mean it gets deleted. There's more to it than that. -- DarkJedi613 ^(Talk) 14:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.