Category Title

I really don't like the category title for this, is there something better we can use? It has a semicolon in it for crying out loud! Does this even really need to be a category? -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 15:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

How about: Articles related to Horcruxes? - Cavalier One(Wizarding Wireless Network) 16:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Er.... I thought things related to Horcruxes should have a category since they can't be put in the "Horcrux" category... Mafalda Hopkirk 18:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Right, but like I feel like anything can fit in here. I mean you could put in like everyone who's every heard of seen a Horcrux in this category. Like my point is, is it useful? -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 05:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
It would only be for things that are directly related to horcruxes, such as Godric Gryffindor's sword. Is there a better category title, but perhaps shorter than the one Cav suggested? Mafalda Hopkirk 05:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I like Cav's. Its really not that long. And, I don't know the whole ; is throwing me off. I can do the move if need be. -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 20:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I really don't think this category is necessary. ShirleyALuna Lovegood(The Quibbler) 08:27, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Its better to have more categories than not enough. What would be gained by removing this category? -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 14:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
I agree with DarkJedi613 (Talk) . I don't understand why there are wikia users that don't create nothing but they like to delete the works that others did. Andre G. Dias (talk) 11:53, December 28, 2013 (Brazil)

I suggest to add the article Herpo the Foul's Horcrux [1] to this category. Andre G. Dias (talk) 11:57, December 28, 2013 (Brazil)

Shouldn't the Horcrux Destroyers be in this category?

Shouldn't all the Horcrux Destroyers be in this category?Kidkidleon (talk) 17:16, September 3, 2016 (UTC)